Friday, January 24, 2020

”Neuroscientist whose brain broke" The mysterious phenomenon that happened when almost losing the function of her left brain



I found an interesting video of Dai Tamesue (you may have already seen it) 

It's along the theme of "cognition and editing abilities"

・About the zone
・Being able to jump hurdles because of the existence of the bar
・About the pronome

It had many hints on "how to handle yourself"‼️

↓↓


Cerebral hemorrhage 
The miracle brain 
Neuroscientist whose brain broke 

The mysterious phenomenon that happened when she almost lost all functionality of her left brain. 


Couldn't tell the difference between me and the wall. 
The zone, the fusion of separation. 
A world where borders become ambiguous, and language became unclear. 


Verbal   Non-verbal  →This can affect performance 
The concepts you believe are what limit you 
Freeing yourself from words (verbal limitations) →the zone 

Pronome 
The bar and the mirror that young girls use when learning ballet
This is what creates them to become world class ballerinas. 

For growth, both the "bar" and the "mirror" are necessary. 

If you imagine that you're playing in your surroundings as you challenge things, things change! 

What type of people are good at editing? 
Those who can predict things. Analogical. 

If there are no limitations, obstacles or walls, 
it is harder to increase speed. 
The frame is a mold 

__________________________

Future information from Mr. Ita 

↓↓↓

"Smart toilet" 
This is an interesting research by a scientist team at a lab at Morgeridge institute of Wisconsin-Madison University. They are developing a "smart toilet" that makes use of the massive amounts of data in our urine about our metabolism and other information about our health?! 


↓ ↓
(Reference) For early discovery of diseases and your health management, leave it to the "smart toilet"!
https://tabi-labo.com/293500/wt-smart-toilets
 
__________________________
Appreciation to everyone in the regions! 



Thank you, Matsui-chan!



Thank you! 

お金のポケットが増える スゴイ! 稼ぎ方お金のポケットが増える スゴイ! 稼ぎ方1,512円
Amazon

まず、バカになろうまず、バカになろう1,320円
Amazon
__________________________

From Toshitaka Mochizuki's mail magazine

↓↓↓

□■━━━━━
 For those who can motivate themselves, 
   "rewards" come around
□■━━━━━

┌1)Do people move 
 when a carrot is dangled before them?
└──────

"Working because they give me a salary" 
"Studying because I can get pocket money" 

When a "carrot" is dangled in front of people 
they move.

This is the established theory of motivation. 

But is that really all there is to it?

In 1977, a certain research was done at 
Rochester University in America
by an enthusiastic psychologist, 
Dr. Edward Deci, 
and Richard Ryan who was a 
clinical research student at the time. 

They both had a common theme.


∴‥∵‥∴‥∵‥∴

"To find high quality motivation that will 
allow people to realize the best experience and performance
 and to work on something wholeheartedly." 

∴‥∵‥∴‥∵‥∴

The experiment was done in this order.

24 university students were asked to solve a 
cube puzzle, and they measured their motivation 
by the length of time it took. 

The subjects were separated into 2 groups, 
and thus began this 3 day experiment. 

What the research team focused on at this time was, 
how they spent 【break time】during this experiment. 

Break time was 480 seconds (6 minutes) 

How it was used was up to the subjects. 

They could continue solving the puzzle, 
or they could read the magazines on the table etc.

--------
day 1
--------

This is the time that the group 
took part in solving the puzzle, 
during the break of the first day, 


Group A, an average of 【248】seconds
Group B, an average of 【213】seconds

--------
Day 2
--------

The next day, they added one ingenuity 

To only group A, they were promised that 
as each puzzle was solved, that they would be paid 1 dollar per puzzle.

Even a little "reward" is a joyful thing.


As expected, group A didn't leave the puzzle, 
even during the break time. 

This is how the results were affected. 

Group A, an average of 【319】seconds
Group B, an average of 【205】seconds

Through just a small reward, 
the motivation of group A increased roughly 1.3 times!

As suspected, the power of money created motivation. 

And from here is where it gets interesting.



┌2)For the who can motivate themselves,
  "rewards" come around
└──────

Day 3
--------

Next, they inform group A that "today there will be no rewards." 

Well that's disappointing. 

Now, take a look at the time that both groups took 
during break to work on the puzzle.

Group A, an average of 【198】seconds
Group B, an average of 【241】seconds

What do you know, by just being disappointed, 
group A's motivation went down almost 40% from the day before!

On the other hand, group B that had no talk of reward, 
was unaffected, and on the 3rd day showed the highest motivation 
of taking part in solving the puzzle for the longest. 


"Getting money" 
"being given a position" 
"Being praised in front of everyone" 

It's true that these outward forms of "rewards" strongly move us.

At times it can be very useful to get us off our butts. 

However, there is no guarantee that we will receive these outside "rewards" 

What is most scary is when we are disappointed, our reaction is one of depression and a big drop in motivation.

What's important here is enjoying "the very fact that you are doing it." 

「Ingenuity」・「Improvement」・「Contemplation」

These are all in fact skills that can birth motivation inside of you. 


And as you continue these things, then once again 
"rewards" come from the outside. 

"Rewards" come around to those 
who can create their own motivation. 

Thank you for reading 

***************
Reference for today's episode was taken with gratitude from 

▼ The intrinsic motivation of Richard Ryan and Edward Deci
https://www.apa.org/members/content/intrinsic-motivation
--------
Newton 2020.2 P.122
"Practical psychology that will help you part 2  Educational Psychology" 
***************